Artificial intelligence & ML

Frontier commercial models where capability matters, open-weight models where control and cost matter, and classical machine learning where it is simply the right tool.

ClaudeGPTGeminiLlama MistralPyTorchTensorFlowscikit-learn LangChainModel Context ProtocolvLLMONNX

Mobile

Native where the experience demands it, cross-platform where speed of delivery wins. Both routes ship through automated pipelines with the same quality gates.

SwiftSwiftUIKotlinJetpack Compose FlutterReact NativeCore MLTensorFlow Lite Fastlane

Cloud & infrastructure

Provider-appropriate rather than provider-loyal. Infrastructure is defined in code, reviewed like application code and reproducible from an empty account.

AWSAzureGoogle CloudKubernetes DockerTerraformServerlessCloudflare

Data

Modern, testable data stacks — with vector and search infrastructure treated as first-class citizens alongside the relational and analytical layers.

PostgreSQLSnowflakeBigQueryDatabricks KafkaSparkdbtAirflow pgvectorElasticsearch

Application engineering

Typed languages, tested boundaries and framework choices that a new engineer can read in a week rather than reverse-engineer over a quarter.

TypeScriptPythonGoRust Java.NETReactNext.js Node.jsGraphQL

Delivery & security

Everything ships through the same path: automated tests, security scanning, policy checks, then a reviewed release. Manual deployment is treated as an incident.

GitHub ActionsGitLab CIArgo CDOpenTelemetry GrafanaSAST / DASTOIDCVault

Engineering standards

What we hold constant

Technology choices change with every project. These do not.

  • Everything in version control — application code, infrastructure, prompts, evaluation sets and documentation
  • Automated quality gates — no route to production that skips tests, review and scanning
  • Observability from the first commit — structured logs, metrics and traces, not added after the first outage
  • Reversibility — every release can be rolled back, every model version can be pinned
  • Documented decisions — architecture decision records so future teams know why, not just what
  • Exit-ready — you can take the whole system in-house at any point, and we will help you do it

How we evaluate a new technology

Does it remove real complexity?01
Can we operate it at 3 a.m.?02
Is the security model clear?03
Can the client hire for it?04
What is the exit cost?05

If a technology fails more than one of these, it does not go into a client system — however interesting it is.

Want the detail behind any of this?

We are happy to walk your technical team through architecture, trade-offs and the reasoning behind our recommendations.